4.6 Article

Localized interleukin-10 gene transfer induces apoptosis of alloreactive T cells via Fas/FasL pathway, improves function, and prolongs survival of cardiac allograft

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 73, 期 7, 页码 1019-1026

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200204150-00002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We hypothesized that localized IL-10 gene transfer can induce alloreactive T cell apoptosis and tested this hypothesis with liposome-mediated ex vivo intracoronary IL-10 gene transfer using a functional heterotopic allograft heart transplant model in rabbits. Localized IL-10 overexpression prolonged cardiac allograft survival over three folds. In parallel with the time-course of IL-10 overexpression, the percentage of apoptotic CD3+ cells among total CD3+ cells was Significantly increased in the gene therapy group (36.5+/-3.9%) compared with that in the control group (6.2+/-2.6%, P<0.01) on postoperative day (POD) 3-6, and it was further increased (45.8+/-5.7%) on POD7-10. Apoptotic CD4+ and CD8+ cells were also significantly increased in the gene group (P<0.01). In contrast, the percentage of apoptotic myocytes significantly decreased from 10.1+/-0.8% in the control group to 3.5+/-0.4% in the gene group on POD7-10 (P<0.01). This reduction was inversely correlated with the increase in the percentages of apoptotic CD4+ and CD8+ cells (P<0.01). The percentage of caspase-3 positive myocytes was significantly reduced, although percentages of caspase-3 positive CD4+ and CD8+ cells were markedly increased in the gene group (P<0.01). Moreover, about 60-80% of apoptotic T lymphocytes expressed Fas in the gene group compared with less than 10% in the control group (P<0.01). These results suggest that localized IL-10 gene transfer induces alloreactive T cell apoptosis via the Fas/FasL pathway that may contribute to the alleviated acute rejection, improved cardiac function, and prolonged survival in the IL-10 gene-treated cardiac allografts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据