4.6 Article

Full-length sequence of VERL, the egg vitelline envelope receptor for abalone sperm lysin

期刊

GENE
卷 288, 期 1-2, 页码 111-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00459-6

关键词

sperm-egg recognition; acrosome reaction; invertebrate; fertilization; concerted evolution; repetitive DNA; egg coat

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD12986] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abalone sperm use 16 kDa lysin to create a hole in the egg vitelline envelope (VE) by a species-specific, nonenzymatic mechanism. To create the hole, lysin binds tightly to VERL (the VE receptor for lysin), a giant, unbranched glycoprotein comprising 30% of the VE. Binding of lysin to VERL causes the VERL molecules to lose cohesion and splay apart creating the hole. Lysin and VERL represent a cognate pair of gamete recognition proteins, one male the other female, which mediate fertilization. The coevolution of such cognate pairs may underlie the establishment of species-specific fertilization which could be a component of the mechanism to achieve reproductive isolation and hence new species. Here we present the full-length cDNA sequence (11,166 bp) of VERL from the red abalone (Haliotis rufescens). There are 42 amino acids from the start Met residue to the beginning of the first `VERL repeat'. Most of VERL (9981 bp; 89.4%) consists of 22 tandem repeats of a similar to153 amino acid sequence that is predicted to be beta-sheet. The last VERL repeat is followed by 353 non-repeat amino acid residues containing a furin cleavage site (RTRR), a ZP domain and a hydrophobic COOH-terminus with a 3' UTR of only 10 nucleotides. VERL repeats 3-22 have been subjected to concerted evolution and consequently have almost identical sequences. Curiously, comparisons of repeats from other species shows that repeats 1 and 2 of red abalone VERL have not been subjected to concerted evolution since the divergence of the red species from the other six California species. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据