4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma - A cytopathologic, immunocytochemical, and flow cytometric study

期刊

CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY
卷 96, 期 2, 页码 110-116

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10480

关键词

adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL); cytology; immunocytochemistry; flow cytometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) is a postthymic lympho-proliferative neoplasm of T cells caused by human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV-1). Most cases are found in Japan, the Caribbean basin, and West Africa. DESIGN. To identify diagnostic parameters for cytology in this neoplasm, the authors under-took a retrospective review of all ATLL samples from 1990 to 2000. RESULTS. One hundred fourteen samples from 34 patients with the diagnosis of ATLL were reviewed: 80 cerebrospinal fluids, 7 pleural effusions, 4 bronchoalveolar lavages, 2 peritoneal effusions as well as fine-needle aspirations of 15 lymph nodes, 4 subcutaneous lesions, and 2 breast nodules. Twenty-one patients were women and 13 were men, with an age range of 30 to 71 years. Morphologically, 0 specimens were characterized by the presence of a polymorphous population of lymphocytes ranging from small bland-appearing lymphocytes to large atypical ones with bizarre, multilobulated nuclei (flower-like or clover leaf cells) with coarse chromatin and prominent nucleoli. The cytoplasm was deeply basophilic with occasional vacuoles. Immunocytochemistry was performed on 17 specimens from 14 patients. In all cases tested, tumor cells were immunoreactive for CD3, CD4, CD5, and CD25 and were nonimmunoreactive for CD7 and CD8. Flow cytometry was performed on 12 specimens from 9 patients. The tumor cells in all cases tested were positive for CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, and CD25 and were negative for CD7. CONCLUSIONS. Despite the polymorphous nature of ATLL, diagnosis can be established by close attention to nuclear cytologic features in conjunction with ancillary studies such as immunocytochemistry and/or flow cytometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据