4.6 Article

Nitric oxide (NO) induces nitration of protein kinase Cε (PKCε), facilitating PKCε translocation via enhanced PKCε-RACK2 interactions -: A novel mechanism of NO-triggered activation of PKCε

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 277, 期 17, 页码 15021-15027

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112451200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-65431, HL-63901, HL-55757, HL-68088, HL-43151] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activation of protein kinase C (PKC) epsilon by nitric oxide (NO) has been implicated in the development of cardio-protection. However, the cellular mechanisms underlying the activation of PKCepsilon by NO remain largely unknown. Nitration of protein tyrosine residues has been shown to alter functions of a variety of proteins, and NO-derived peroxynitrite is known as a strong nitrating agent. In this investigation, we demonstrate that NO donors promote translocation and activation of PKCepsilon in an NO- and peroxynitrite-dependent fashion. NO induces peroxynitrite-mediated tyrosine nitration of PKCepsilon in rabbit cardiomyocytes in vitro, and nitrotyrosine residues were also detected on PKCepsilon in vivo in the rabbit myocardium preconditioned with NO donors. Furthermore, coinununoprecipitation of PKCepsilon and its receptor for activated C kinase, RACK2, illustrated a peroxynitrite-dependent increase in PKCepsilon-RACK2 interactions in NO donor-treated cardiomyocytes. Moreover, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based protein-protein interaction assay, PKCepsilon proteins treated with the peroxynitrite donor SIN-1 exhibited enhanced binding to RACK2 in an acellular environment. Our data demonstrate that post-translational modification of PKCepsilon by NO donors, namely nitration of PKCepsilon, facilitates its interaction with RACK2 and promotes translocation and activation of PKCepsilon. These findings offer a plausible novel mechanism by which NO activates the PKC signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据