4.3 Article

Remote-sensing application for facilitating land resource assessment and monitoring for utility-scale solar energy development

期刊

出版社

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.9.097694

关键词

utility scale; solar energy development; environmental monitoring; very high resolution; spectral indices; desert regions

资金

  1. DOE's SunShot Initiative [27239]
  2. [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A monitoring plan that incorporates regional datasets and integrates cost-effective data collection methods is necessary to sustain the long-term environmental monitoring of utility-scale solar energy developments in expansive, environmentally sensitive desert regions. An image processing routine using very high spatial resolution (VHSR; i.e., 15 cm) multispectral imagery collected in November 2012 and January 2014 was developed to characterize ephemeral streams, vegetation, and land surfaces in the southwestern United States, where increased utility-scale solar development is anticipated. In addition to information about desert landscapes, the methodology integrates existing spectral indices and transformations (e.g., visible atmospherically resistant index and principal components); a new index called the erosion resistance index (ERI); and digital terrain and surface models, all of which were derived from a common VHSR image. The methodology identified fine-scale ephemeral streams at greater detail than does the National Hydrography Dataset, and it accurately estimated the distribution of vegetation and the fractional cover of various surface types. The ERI classified surface types that have a range of erosive potentials. The remote-sensing methodology could ultimately reduce uncertainty and monitoring costs for all stakeholders by providing a cost-effective monitoring approach that accurately characterizes the land resources at potential development sites. (C) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据