4.0 Article

Dendrochronological assessment of the time since death of dead wood in an old growth Magellan's beech forest, Navarino Island (Chile)

期刊

AUSTRAL ECOLOGY
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 329-340

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02154.x

关键词

austral cold ecosystem; cross-dating technique; dead wood decay progression; dendrochronology; Nothofagus betuloides

类别

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study investigated the relationship between time since death and the morphological characteristics of fallen dead trees in a Nothofagus betuloides forest stand located on the island of Navarino (Chile). In this unmanaged forest, there were 399 m3 ha-1 of dead wood, which represented about half of the living tree volume. At the investigation site, 18 living trees were selected and increment cores were collected from them to build master ring-width chronologies. Cross sections were also collected from 48 fallen dead trees. The samples collected were then assigned to observable decay classes and their death date was determined dendrochronologically. Cross-dating techniques were used and it was found that the fallen dead trees cross-dated significantly with standard chronologies. A year of death was successfully determined for 75% of the sampled fallen dead trees. However, this study demonstrated that, in the standard classification, the transition rate from one class of decay to another was highly variable. Furthermore, the inconsistencies found in the decay rates of the fallen dead trees demonstrated that the existing decay classification schemes were unsuitable for this type of forest stand and that the relationship between qualitatively assessed decay classes and the time since death of trees in this extreme environment was rather weak. In addition, the analysis of the time since death, in this old growth forest, was indicative of the persistence of dead wood on the forest floor in austral cold ecosystems and of its contribution to long-term carbon storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据