4.4 Article

Identification of two prpDBC gene clusters in Corynebacterium glutamicum and their involvement in propionate degradation via the 2-methylcitrate cycle

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 184, 期 10, 页码 2728-2739

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.184.10.2728-2739.2002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome sequencing revealed that the Corynebacterium glutanticum genome contained, besides gltA, two additional citrate synthase homologous genes (prpC) located in two different prpDBC gene clusters, which were designated prpDIB1C1 and prpD2B2C2. The coding regions of the two gene clusters as well as the predicted gene products showed sequence identities of about 70 to 80%. Significant sequence similarities were found also to the prpBCDE operons of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica, which are known to encode enzymes of the propionate-degrading 2-methylcitrate pathway. Homologous and heterologous overexpression of the C. glutamicum prpC1 and prpC2 genes revealed that their gene products were active as citrate synthases and 2-methylcitrate synthases. Growth tests showed that C. glutamicum used propionate as a single or partial carbon source, although the beginning of the exponential growth phase was strongly delayed by propionate for up to 7 days. Compared to growth on acetate, the specific 2-methylcitrate synthase activity increased about 50-fold when propionate was provided as the sole carbon source, suggesting that in C. glutainicum the oxidation of propionate to pyruvate occurred via the 2-methylcitrate pathway. Additionally, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis experiments combined with mass spectrometry showed strong induction of the expression of the C. glutamicum prpD2B2C2 genes by propionate as an additional carbon source. Mutational analyses revealed that only the prpD2B2C2 genes were essential for the growth of C. glutamicum on propionate as a sole carbon source, while the function of the prpDIB1C1 genes remains obscure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据