4.6 Article

CO and dust in PSS 2322+1944 at a redshift of 4.12

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 387, 期 2, 页码 406-411

出版社

E D P SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020382

关键词

galaxies : formation; quasars : emission lines; quasars : individual : PSS 2322+1944; cosmology : observations; cosmology : early Universe; radio lines : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using the IRAM interferometer we have detected J=4-->3 and 5-->4 CO line emission toward the radio quiet quasar PSS 2322+1944. At a redshift of z(CO)=4.1199 this is the fourth and strongest detection of CO at z>4. The velocity-integrated CO J=4-->3 and J=5-->4 line fluxes are 4.21+/-0.40 and 3.74+/-0.56 Jy km s(-1), and the linewidth is approximate to300 km s(-1). The CO J=10-->9 was searched for but not detected with an upper intensity limit of 30 mJy. The 1.35 mm (250 mum rest wavelength) continuum flux density is 7.5+/-1.3 mJy, in agreement with previous bolometer measurements at 1.2 mm with the 30-m IRAM telescope. The 3 mm (580 mum rest wavelength) continuum is not detected with a 3 sigma upper limit of 0.7 mJy. We also report observations of the 450 mum continuum in PSS 2322+1944 using the SCUBA array at the JCMT. The quasar was detected with a 450 mum flux density of 79+/-19 mJy. At the angular resolution of 4.8+/-2.1 at 1.3 mm and 6.2+/-4.9 at 3.2 mm, the interferometer observations do not show evidence of spatial extension in the continuum or CO line emission. Assuming no gravitational magnification, we estimate a molecular gas mass of approximate to2.5x10(11) M-circle dot. The molecular gas is warm (40-100 K) and dense (10(3.5)-10(4.1) cm(-3)). The infrared-to-CO luminosity ratio is approximate to185 L-circle dot (K km s(-1) pc(2))(-1), comparable to the values found for ultraluminous infrared galaxies. The detection of CO emission in this high redshift QSO provides further evidence that the radio emission and the millimeter to submillimeter continuum emission are predominantly powered by a starburst which is coeval with the AGN activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据