4.7 Article

Improved tumor selectivity of radiolabeled peptides by receptor and antigen dual targeting in the neurotensin receptor model

期刊

BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 654-662

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bc015585g

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiolabeled peptides are emerging tools for diagnosis and therapy of tumors overexpressing receptors. However, binding to receptors expressed by nontumor tissues may cause toxicity. The objective of this study was to specifically enhance the binding affinity of labeled peptides to tumor cells, as opposed to receptor-positive nontumor cells, to ensure targeting selectivity. This was achieved by the simultaneous binding of hapten-bearing peptides to their receptor and to a tumor-associated antigen, mediated by a bispecific antibody directed to the tumor antigen and to the hapten. Binding of labeled neurotensin analogues bearing the DTPA(indium) hapten (NT-DTPA(In-111)) to human colorectal carcinoma cells (HT29), which express the neurotensin receptor (NTR1) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), was studied in the presence of a bispecific antibody (BsmAb) directed to CEA and to DTPA-(indium). In vitro dual binding of NT-DTPA in the presence of BsmAb was about 6.5-fold higher than monovalent binding to NTR1 and 3.5-fold higher than the sum of the monovalent bindings to NTR1 or to CEA, suggesting cooperativity. Increased binding under bivalent conditions translated into increased internalization. In vivo pretargeting with BsmAb enhanced tumor uptake and tumor retention. Hapten bearing peptides binding simultaneously an overexpressed cell-surface receptor and a tumor antigen show increased selectivity to target tumor cells as compared to cells only expressing the cell surface receptor. Better resistance to enzymatic degradation and optimized administration protocols should further enhance in vivo targeting selectivity and may allow the development of radiopharmaceuticals labeled with isotopes suitable for radiotherapy such as I-131 or Y-90.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据