4.2 Article

Optical coherence tomography for observation of the olfactory epithelium in mice

期刊

AURIS NASUS LARYNX
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 230-237

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2018.08.009

关键词

Degeneration; Imaging; Olfactory epithelium; Optical coherence tomography; Regeneration

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [26462603, 26462580, 18K16840]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26462580, 18K16840, 26462603] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an imaging tool that exploits the coherence of infrared light and is clinically utilized in the field of ophthalmology and dermatology. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of using OCT for diagnosing degeneration and regeneration of the olfactory epithelium in mice. Methods: The olfactory and respiratory epithelia in excised nasal septa of adult mice were observed using OCT. Subsequently, histological assessments were performed with hematoxylin and eosin (H-E) staining. The thicknesses of the olfactory or respiratory epithelia were measured in both OCT images and H-E-stained paraffin sections. The ability of OCT to distinguish olfactory epithelia from respiratory epithelia in normal mice was compared with that of H-E staining. The feasibility of using OCT assessments for detecting changes in the thickness of olfactory epithelia was tested in a mouse model of the degeneration and regeneration of olfactory epithelia. Results: OCT allowed visualization of the gross morphology of the olfactory and respiratory epithelium in normal mice, although it was limited in terms of visualizing cellular components. OCT-based measurements of epithelial thickness helped to distinguish olfactory epithelia from respiratory epithelia. Similar to H-E staining, OCT also clarified changes in the olfactory epithelium thickness after methimazole application. Conclusions: These findings indicate the utility of OCT for assessment of olfactory epithelial thickness and its potential for clinical evaluation of human olfactory epithelia. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据