4.2 Article

Resection of peripheral branches of the posterior nasal nerve compared to conventional posterior neurectomy in severe allergic rhinitis

期刊

AURIS NASUS LARYNX
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 593-596

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2011.11.006

关键词

Allergic rhinitis; Rhinorrhea; Submucosal turbinectomy; Endoscopic surgery; Posterior nasal neurectomy

资金

  1. Japanese Foundation for Research and Promotion of Endoscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Transnasal resection of the posterior nasal nerve (TRPN) is the surgical procedure for drug therapy-resistant, intractable allergic rhinitis (AR). Submucous inferior turbinectomy also improves nasal symptoms in severe AR. Surgical injury to this peripheral nerve fibre may be the major cause of the decrease in allergic symptoms. During submucous turbinectomy, we have identified the peripheral branches of the posterior nasal nerve in the inferior turbinate and resected them (SRPN). The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of turbinoplasty with SRPN in severe AR. Methods: Improvements in subjective symptoms were compared between 13 patients who underwent SRPN with turbinoplasty (Group 1) and 11 who underwent TRPN combined with turbinoplasty and SRPN (Group 2) by retrospective chart review. Pre- and postoperative sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal obstruction were evaluated with questionnaires. Postoperative complications and drug therapy before and after surgery were investigated. Results: All symptoms improved postoperatively in both groups, with no significant differences in the improvements in nasal symptom scores between the groups. Conclusions: SRPN combined with submucosal turbinectomy was shown to be a safe, useful, and efficient approach to patients with AR unresponsive to medical therapy. Although this is a short-term study, the results of this study suggest that SRPN represents one of the treatment options for intractable AR. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据