4.2 Article

Comparison between granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 190-198

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00062752-200205000-00003

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have become the preferred source of stem cells for autologous transplantation because of the technical advantage and the shorter time to engraftment. Mobilization of CD34(+) into the peripheral blood can be achieved by the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), or both, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. G-CSF and GM-CSF differ somewhat in the number and composition of PBSCs and effector cells mobilized to the peripheral blood. The purpose of this review is to give a recent update on the type and immunologic properties of CD34(+) cells and CD34(+) cell subsets mobilized by G-CSF or GM-CSF with emphasis on (1) relative efficacy of CD34(+) cell mobilization; (2) relative toxicities of G-CSF and GM-CSF as mobilizing agents; (3) mobilization of dendritic cells and their subsets; (4) delineation of the role of adhesion molecules, CXC receptor 4, and stromal cell-derived factor-1 signaling pathway in the release of CD34(+) cell to the peripheral blood after treatment with G-CSF or GM-CSF. Curr Opin Hematol 2002, 9:190-198 (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据