4.4 Article

CONTINENT-SCALE GENETIC STRUCTURE IN A BOREAL FOREST MIGRANT, THE BLACKPOLL WARBLER (SETOPHAGA STRIATA)

期刊

AUK
卷 129, 期 3, 页码 467-478

出版社

AMER ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION
DOI: 10.1525/auk.2012.11260

关键词

Blackpoll Warbler; boreal forest; coalescent analysis; migratory birds; mitochondrial DNA; Pleistocene refugia; population genetics; Setophaga striata; statistical phylogeography

资金

  1. New York State Museum
  2. American Museum of Natural History
  3. University at Albany Graduate Student Organization
  4. State University of New York Benevolent Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the range-wide phylogeography of Blackpoll Warblers (Setophaga striata), a migratory passerine with a broad breeding range in North America's boreal forest that encompasses several possible biogeographic barriers but shows no phenotypic geographic variation. We used mitochondrial control-region sequences from 304 individuals in combination with ecological niche models and coalescent simulations to test alternative historical hypotheses about the number of Pleistocene refugial populations and divergences among modern populations. Population pairwise F-ST. and spatial analyses of molecular variance suggested significant genetic structure among western, eastern, and Newfoundland populations, but no structure among sky-island populations at the southeastern periphery of the breeding range. Inferred gene flow fits a model of isolation-by-distance. Coalescent simulations rejected all multiple-refugia hypotheses in favor of a single refugium. Paleodistribution models and modern migratory pathways suggested that the refugium was located in southeastern North America. In contrast to previous studies that have invoked multiple Pleistocene refugia as the cause of genetic structure in North American bird species, our analyses suggest that geographic structure in Blackpoll Warblers results from isolation-by-distance rather than a history of sundered populations. Received 23 November 2011, accepted 20 March 2012.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据