4.8 Article

Mechanism by which high-dose aspirin improves glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 109, 期 10, 页码 1321-1326

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI200214955

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR-00125, M01 RR000125] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK051729, R01 DK-51729, K23 DK002734, R01 DK-49230, R01 DK049230, K23 DK-02734, P30 DK-34576] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have implicated fatty acid-dependent activation of the serine kinase IKKbeta, which plays a key role in tissue inflammation, in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. High doses of salicylates have recently been shown to inhibit IKKbeta activity and might therefore ameliorate insulin resistance and improve glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes. To rest this hypothesis, we studied nine type 2 diabetic subjects before and after 2 weeks of treatment with aspirin (similar to7 g/d). Subjects underwent mixed-meal tolerance tests and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps with [6,6-H-2(2)]glucose to assess glucose turnover before and after treatment. High-dose aspirin treatment resulted in a similar to25% reduction in fasting plasma glucose, associated with a similar to15% reduction in total cholesterol and C-reactive protein, a similar to50% reduction in triglycerides, and a similar to30% reduction in insulin clearance, despite no change in body weight. During a mixed-meal tolerance test, the areas under the curve for plasma glucose and fatty acid levels decreased by similar to20% and similar to50%, respectively. Aspirin treatment also resulted in a similar to20% reduction in basal rates of hepatic glucose production and a similar to20% improvement in insulin-stimulated peripheral glucose uptake under matched plasma insulin concentrations during the clamp. In conclusion, these data support the hypothesis that IKKbeta represents a new target for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据