4.7 Article

Annual primary production: Patterns and mechanisms of change in a nutrient-rich tidal ecosystem

期刊

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 698-712

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2002.47.3.0698

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although nutrient supply often underlies long-term changes in aquatic primary production, other regulator processes can he important. The Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, a complex of tidal waterways forming the landward portion of the San Francisco Estuary, has ample nutrient supplies, enabling us to examine alternate regulatory mechanisms over a 21-yr period. Delta-wide primary productivity was reconstructed from historical water quality data for 1975-1995. Annual primary production averaged 70 C m(-2), but it varied by over a factor of five among years. At least four processes contributed to this variability: (1) invasion of the clam Potamocorbula amurensis led to a persistent decrease in phytoplankton biomass (chlorophyll a) after 1986: (2) a long-term decline in total suspended solids-probably at least partly because of upstream dam construction-increased water transparency and phytoplankton growth rate: (3) river inflow, reflecting climate variability, affected biomass through fluctuations in flushing and growth rates through fluctuations in total Suspended solids: and (4) an additional pathway manifesting as a long-term decline in winter phytoplankton biomass has been identified, but its genesis is uncertain. Overall, the Delta lost 43% in annual primary production during the period. Given the evidence for food limitation of primary Consumers, these findings provide a partial explanation for widespread Delta species declines over the past few decades. Turbid nutrient-rich systems Such as the Delta may he inherently more variable than other tidal systems because certain compensatory processes are absent. Comparisons among systems, however can be tenuous because conclusions about the magnitude and mechanisms of variability are dependent on length of data record.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据