4.4 Article

Mobilization of dendritic cell precursors in patients with cancer by Flt3 ligand allows the generation of higher yields of cultured dendritic cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 278-288

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002371-200205000-00011

关键词

dendritic cells; Flt3 ligand; melanoma cancer; renal cancer

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 SC003811-33] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flt3 ligand (Flt3L) stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic cells. Subcutaneous Flt3L administration has been shown to effectively manage some murine cancers and in humans, to lead to an increase in peripheral blood monocyte and dendritic cell (DC) counts. In the current study, we determined the effects of Flt3L therapy on patients with melanoma and renal cancer, and in particular, if Flt3L could be used either by enhancing the immunization of patients with melanoma to tumor antigen peptides in vivo, or by mobilizing DC precursors to allow the production of larger numbers of cultured DC. Flt3 ligand administration resulted in a 19-fold increase in DC counts in the peripheral blood of patients. The DC generated in vivo appeared only partially activated, expressing increased levels of CD86, CD33, and major histocompatibility complex class H, but no or low levels of CD80 and CD83. This partial activation may account for the lack of enhanced immune responses to melanoma anti-ens and absence of clinical responses in the patients even in combination with antigen immunization. Flt3 ligand administration did result, however, in a 7-fold increased yield of monocytes per liter of blood from leukapheresed patients. Dendritic cells were as readily generated from monocytes collected before and after Flt3L therapy, and they stimulated allogeneic T-cell proliferation in a mixed leukocyte reaction to a similar magnitude. Thus, the use of Flt3L may be an important method to mobilize DC precursors to allow patient therapy with larger numbers of cultured DC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据