4.7 Article

Phase II trial of weekly single-agent paclitaxel in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 2365-2369

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.09.130

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We wished to critically examine the level of activity of weekly paclitaxel in a patient population with well-characterized platinum/paclitaxel-resistant (3-week schedule) ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods: Eligibility criteria for this phase 11 trial included the following: ovarian and fallopian tube cancers or primary carcinoma of the peritoneum; prior initial therapy with platinum/paclitaxel; and failure to respond to treatment (progression or stable disease as best response), or a response duration of less than 3 months, or if the response was more than 3 months, retreatment with both agents required and failure to respond a second time or the response duration was less than 3 months. Measurable or assessable disease (CA-125 response criteria) was required. Patients received weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity developed, or they elected to discontinue treatment. Results: Fifty-three patients (52 assessable for toxicity and 51 for response) were entered onto this multi-institution trial. Of 248 total cycles (887 doses), only 13 (1%) were modified (dose reduction or treatment delay) because of side effects. Therapy was discontinued in five patients because of toxicity (four because of peripheral neuropathy, and one because of painful fingernail beds). Thirteen patients (25%; 95% confidence interval, 13.5% to 37.5%) achieved an objective response (four by CA-125 criteria, and nine by 50% reduction of measurable disease). Conclusion: Weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) is generally well tolerated and is an active second-line regimen against ovarian cancer that has demonstrated resistance to platinum/paclitaxel delivered on an every-3-week schedule.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据