4.7 Review

Coronal outflow dominated accretion discs: a new possibility for low-luminosity black holes?

期刊

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05288.x

关键词

accretion, accretion discs; black hole physics; magnetic fields

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spectral-energy distributions of galactic black holes in the low/hard state and of low-luminosity active galactic nuclei (AGNs) possess many common features, the most prominent being: compact, flat- (or inverted-)spectrum radio cores with high brightness temperatures; excess red and infrared emission, often correlated with the radio flux; an extremely weak (or absent) quasi-thermal hump and a hard-X-ray power-law with high-energy cut-off. These sources are thought to be accreting at low rates, and advection- (or convection-)dominated accretion flows are usually considered the best candidates to explain them. Here we present an alternative possibility, involving strong, unbound, magnetic coronae generated by geometrically thin, optically thick accretion discs at low accretion rates. First we show that, if angular momentum transport in the disc is due to magnetic turbulent stresses, the magnetic energy density and effective viscous stresses inside the disc are proportional to the geometric mean of the total (gas plus radiation) and gas pressure. Therefore the corona is less powerful in a radiation-pressure dominated disc, and the relative fraction of the power liberated in the corona increases as the accretion rate decreases. Furthermore, we discuss why energetically dominant coronae are ideal sites for launching powerful jets/outflows, both MHD- and thermally driven. In analysing the spectral properties of such coronal-outflow dominated accretion discs, we reach the important conclusion that if the jet/outflow is, as is likely, radiatively inefficient, then so is the source overall, even without advection of energy into the black hole being relevant for the dynamics of the accretion flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据