4.6 Article

Gene transfer of Ig-fusion proteins into B cells prevents and treats autoimmune diseases

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 168, 期 9, 页码 4788-4795

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.9.4788

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [K08 AI01509, R01 AI35622] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK61327] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the tolerogenic properties of IgG carriers and B cell Ag presentation, we developed a retrovirally mediated gene expression approach for treatment of autoimmune conditions. In this study, we show that the IgG-Ag retroviral constructs, expressing myelin basic protein (MBP) or glutamic acid decarboxylase in B cells, can be used for the treatment of murine models for multiple sclerosis and diabetes. Transduction of syngeneic B cells with MBP-IgG leads to the amelioration of ongoing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis induced by the transfer of primed cells from PLxSJL F-1 mice with ongoing disease and could be effective even after symptoms appeared. This effect is specific and does not involve bystander suppression because treatment with MBP-IgG does not affect disease induced after immunization with proteolipid protein immunodominant peptide plus MBP. Interestingly, if donor B cells are derived from g/d mice (Fas ligand-negative), then tolerance is not induced with a model Ag although there was no evidence for Fas ligand-mediated deletion of target T cells. In spontaneous diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice, we were able to stop the ongoing autoimmune process by treatment at 7-10 wk with glutamic acid decarboxylase-IgG retrovirally transduced B cells, or attenuate it with B cells transduced with an insulin B chain (B9-23) epitope IgG fusion protein. Furthermore, IgG fusion protein gene therapy can also protect primed recipients from Ag-induced anaphylactic shock, and thus does not cause immune deviation. These results demonstrate proof of principle for future efforts to develop this approach in a clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据