4.7 Article

Mechanism of constrictive vascular remodeling by homocysteine: role of PPAR

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 282, 期 5, 页码 C1009-C1015

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00353.2001

关键词

aorta; arteriosclerosis; hypertension; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; fibrate; prostaglandin; endothelial cell; smooth muscle cell

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-51971] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-48595] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To test the hypothesis that homocysteine induces constrictive vascular remodeling by inactivating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), aortic endothelial cells (ECs) and smooth muscle cells (SMCs) were isolated. Collagen gels were prepared, and ECs or SMCs (10(5))or SMCs + ECs (10(4)) were incorporated into the gels. To characterize PPAR, agonists of PPAR-alpha [ciprofibrate (CF)] and PPAR-gamma [15-deoxy-12,14-prostaglandin J(2) (PGJ(2))] were used. To determine the role of disintegrin metalloproteinase (DMP), cardiac inhibitor of metalloproteinase (CIMP) was used in collagen gels. Gel diameter at 0 h was 14.1 +/- 0.2 mm and was unchanged up to 24 h as measured by a digital micrometer. SMCs reduce gel diameter to 10.5 +/- 0.4 mm at 24 h. Addition of homocysteine to SMCs reduces further the gel diameter to 8.0 +/- 0.2 mm, suggesting that SMCs induce contraction and that the contraction is further enhanced by homocysteine. Addition of ECs and SMCs reduces gel diameter to 12.0 +/- 0.3 mm, suggesting that ECs play a role in collagen contraction. Only PGJ(2), not CF, inhibits SMC contraction. However, both PGJ(2) and CF inhibit contraction of ECs and SMCs + ECs. Addition of anti-DMP blocks SMC- as well as homocysteine-mediated contraction. However, CIMP inhibits only homocysteine-mediated contraction. The results suggest that homocysteine may enhance vascular constrictive remodeling by inactivating PPAR-alpha and -gamma in ECs and PPAR-gamma in SMCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据