4.6 Article

A photoionization model of the compact HII region G29.96-0.02

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 386, 期 2, 页码 558-570

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020283

关键词

ISM : individual objects : G29.96-0.02 ISM : individual objects : IRAS 18434-0242; ISM : H II regions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a detailed photoionization model of G29.96-0.02 (hereafter G29.96), one of the brightest Galactic Ultra Compact HII (UCHII) regions in the Galaxy. This source has been observed extensively at radio and infrared wavelengths. The most recent data include a complete ISO (SWS and LWS) spectrum, which displays a remarkable richness in atomic fine-structure lines. The number of observables is twice as great as the number available in previous studies. In addition, most atomic species are now observed in two ionization stages. The radio and infrared data on G29.96 are best reproduced using a nebular model with two density components: a diffuse (n(e) similar to 680 cm(-3)) extended (similar to1 pc) component surrounding a compact (similar to0.1 pc) dense (n(e) similar to 57 000 cm(-3)) core. The properties of the ionizing star were derived using state-of-the-art stellar atmosphere models. CoStar models yield an effective temperature of similar to30(+2)(-1) kK whereas more recent non-LTE line blanketed atmospheres with stellar winds indicate somewhat higher values, T-eff similar to 32-38 kK. This range in T-eff is compatible with all observational constraints, including near-infrared photometry and bolometric luminosity. The range 33-36 kK is also compatible with the spectral type O5-O8 determined by Watson & Hanson (1997) when recent downward revisions of the effective temperature scale of O stars are taken into account. The age of the ionizing star of G29.96 is found to be a few 10(6) yr, much older than the expected lifetime of UCHII regions. Accurate gas phase abundances are derived with the most robust results being Ne/S = 7.5 and N/O = 0.43 (1.3 and 3.5 times the solar values, respectively).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据