4.5 Article

Mechanical ventilation results in progressive contractile dysfunction in the diaphragm

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 92, 期 5, 页码 1851-1858

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00881.2001

关键词

respiratory muscles; muscle atrophy; weaning from mechanical ventilation; muscle injury

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL-62361] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

These experiments tested the hypothesis that a relatively short duration of controlled mechanical ventilation (MV) will impair diaphragmatic maximal specific force generation (specific P-o) and that this force deficit will be exacerbated with increased time on the ventilator. To test this postulate, adult Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into one of six experimental groups: 1) control (n = 12); 2) 12 h of MV (n = 4); 3) 18 h of MV (n = 4); 4) 18 h of anesthesia and spontaneous breathing (n = 4); 5) 24 h of MV (n 7); and 6) 24 h of anesthesia and spontaneous breathing (n 4). MV animals were anesthetized, tracheostomized, and ventilated with room air. Animals in the control group were acutely anesthetized but were not exposed to MV. Animals in two spontaneous breathing groups were anesthetized and breathed spontaneously for either 18 or 24 h. No differences (P > 0.05) existed in diaphragmatic specific P-o between control and the two spontaneous breathing groups. In contrast, compared with control, all durations of MV resulted in a reduction (P < 0.05) in diaphragmatic specific tension at stimulation frequencies ranging from 15 to 160 Hz. Furthermore, the MV-induced decrease in diaphragmatic specific P-o was time dependent, with specific P-o being ∼18 and ∼46% lower (P < 0.05) in animals mechanically ventilated for 12 and 24 h, respectively. These data support the hypothesis that relatively short-term MV impairs diaphragmatic contractile function and that the magnitude of MV-induced force deficit increases with time on the ventilator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据