4.6 Article

Possible association between amniotic fluid micro-organism infection and microflora in the mouth

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01349.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine whether oral bacteria are found in the amniotic cavity. Design Laboratory based analysis of clinical samples. Setting Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel. Population Forty-eight women attending for elective caesarean section. Methods Dental plaque, a high vaginal swab, amniotic fluid and chorioamnion tissue were taken from women with intact membranes. Main outcome measures Samples were investigated using culture and microscopy for the presence of microorganisms. Amniotic fluid was analysed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the presence of the ubiquitous 16S rRNA gene specific to most eubacteria. Samples were analysed using PCR genus and species specific primers directed to bacterial taxa found as part of the normal oral microflora (Streptococcus spp. and Fusobacterium nucleatum). Levels of prostaglandin E-2 and cytokines were measured in amniotic fluid. Results Amniotic fluid was positive for universal bacteria PCR, Streptococcus spp. PCR and F. nucleatum PCR in 34/48, 20/48 and 7/48 of cases, respectively. Streptococcus spp. and F. nucleatum were cultured from the dental plaque, vagina and amniotic fluid of 48/48, 14/48, 0/48 and 29/48, 6/48, 0/48 subjects, respectively. A significant association was found between detection of microbial DNA (universal and F. nucletum) and complications in previous pregnancies including miscarriage, intrauterine death, neonatal death, preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Prostaglandin E-2 and cytokine levels, with the exception of IL-1alpha, were not significantly different between women with and without evidence of infection. Conclusions The results indicate that Streptococcus spp. and F. nucleatum in the amniotic fluid may have an oral origin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据