4.7 Article

Detection of charred organic matter in soils from a Neolithic settlement in Southern Bavaria, Germany

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 107, 期 1-2, 页码 71-91

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00139-2

关键词

charred organic carbon; Neolithic site; C-13 CPMAS NMR spectroscopy; dipolar dephasing NMR; fractionation/high-energy UV photo-oxidation/C-13 CPMAS NMR spectroscopy; benzenepolycarboxylic acids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The amount and chemical structure of the aromatic carbon fraction in archaeological soil materials was investigated. Samples from several Neolithic pits and a ditch from a settlement in southern Germany were analysed together with the surrounding loamy soil. A suite of complementary methods including C-13 CPMAS nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, dipolar dephasing NMR, combined fractionation/high-energy ultraviolet (UV) photo-oxidation/C-13 CPMAS NMR spectroscopy and analysis of benzenepolycarboxylic acids (BPCA) were used to investigate the aromatic organic matter composition of the pits. Most of the Neolithic samples gave the highest proportion of NMR spectral intensity in the aryl carbon region with a dominant peak at 130 ppm with very low, if any, signals for substituted aromatic carbons, such as in lignin or other phenols. Between 29% and 77% of soil organic carbon survived UV photo-oxidation, mostly present as aromatic structures. Dipolar dephasing NMR spectroscopy indicated a high degree of condensation for the aromatic rings while scanning electron microscopy showed that the material had a plant-like morphology. The analysis of BPCAs as specific markers provided further evidence for the presence of highly condensed aromatic structures in the organic matter of the Neolithic pits, The evidence therefore that the aromatic carbon is derived from charcoal is strong. This material either originated from soil material that has undergone vegetation fires or from other charred organic material, e.g., residues from Neolithic fire places. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据