4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Ultrasound stimulation of micro-organisms for enhanced biodegradation

期刊

ULTRASONICS
卷 40, 期 1-8, 页码 25-29

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00086-0

关键词

ultrasound-assisted bioreactor; process water treatment; ultrasound stimulated biodegradation; improved biological activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ultrasound (US)-assisted bioprocess for wastewater treatment for the food industry was developed in a three years EC-funded project (FAIR CT-3259). An improvement of biological activity by US was successfully demonstrated with lab scale reactors [Schlafer et al. Ultrasonics 38 (2000)]. Now a pilot scale optimisation with a 200 1 bioreactor was carried out in co-operation with the Department of Industrial Acoustics, Technical University of Denmark and RESON A/S (Denmark). Batch experiments have been performed by measuring the degradation rate of organic compounds of wastewater. The process parameters were kept constant while varying the US-intensity. A significant increase of biological activity could be obtained only in a very narrow range of US-intensity. Very low US-power leads to a decrease of degradation rate down to the standard value if there is no US-intake. Implementation of too high level of US lead to drastically decreasing of the biological activity to a level far below the standard value if there is no US-intake. The optimisation of this narrow US-power window needs to be carried out carefully for every investigated bioprocess. The most important aspect of the experimental results was that a more than 100% increase of the maximum biological degradation rate has been achieved by US-transduction with an optimum US-intensity of 1.5 W/l wastewater at 25 kHz. The developed bioprocess reduces the overall energy by use of low-energy US-irradiation below the cavitation level. The US-assisted biological degradation process would be presented together with its optimisation and the economical calculation. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据