4.7 Article

Circulating enterolactone and prostate cancer risk: A Nordic nested case-control

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 99, 期 1, 页码 124-129

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10313

关键词

prostatic neoplasm; phytoestrogens; enterolactone; longitudinal; numane

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enterolactone, a phytoestrogen belonging to the class of lignans, is produced by the intestinal microflora, from precursors in plant foods and has been implicated in protection against cancer. We study the effect of enterolactone on the risk of a subsequent diagnosis of prostate cancer. We conducted a longitudinal, nested case-control study by linkage of 3 biobanks to the cancer registries in Finland, Norway and Sweden, respectively. Enterolactone concentrations were measured by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay in serum from 794 men who had a diagnosis of prostate cancer at a mean follow-up time of 14.2 years after blood collection and among 2,550 control men matched within each cohort for age (+/-2 years), date of blood collection (+/-2 months) and county. The median enterolactone concentrations did not differ between case and control subjects in the full study group (8.4 nmol/L [25th-75th percentile = 4.5-15.0] vs. 8.5 nmol/L [25th-75th percentile = 4.3-15.9]), nor in the national groups. Odds ratios of prostate cancer risk estimated by conditional logistic regression for increasing concentrations of enterolactone in quartiles in the full study group were 1.00 (referent), 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.52), 1.16 (95% CI = 0.91-1.47) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.83-1.39). The OR estimate for the highest vs. the lowest quartile of enterolactone in separate analyses of the Norwegian, Finnish and Swedish cohort was 1.21 (95% CI = 0.91-1.60), 1.02 (95% CI = 0.59-1.76) and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.45-1.67), respectively. No support for the hypothesis that high circulating enterolactone is protective against prostate cancer was found. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据