4.3 Article

Association of MPF, MAPK, and nuclear progression dynamics during activation of young and aged bovine oocytes

期刊

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 62, 期 1, 页码 132-138

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.10072

关键词

bovine oocytes; MPF; MAPK; cdc25; activation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously shown that bovine oocytes parthenogenetically activated after 40 hours (hr) of in vitro maturation proceed through the cell cycle faster than those after 20 hr of maturation. In the present study, we used this model of different speed of nuclear progression to investigate the correlation of two hallmarks of nuclear events, exit of metaphase arrest and pronuclear formation, with dynamics of MPF and MAPK. Bovine oocytes were matured in vitro for 20 hr (young) or 40 hr (aged) and activated in 7% ethanol followed by incubation in cycloheximide for 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 5, or 7 hr. Activity of MPF and MAPK was lower in aged than young oocytes. The responses to oocyte activation by both the two kinases and nuclear progression were faster in aged than in young oocytes. The activity of MPF declined to undetectable levels (P < 0.05) as early as 0.5 hr after activation in aged oocytes, while this did not happen in young oocytes until 3 hr after activation. The inactivation of MAPK occurred approximately 2 hr earlier in aged oocytes (5 hr post-activation) than in young oocytes (7 hr post-activation). Furthermore, the decline in MPF activity preceded that of MAPK in both young and aged oocytes by about 2 hr. The decrease in activity of MPF and MAPK corresponded with the exit from meiosis and pronuclei formation regardless of the speed of nuclear progression. Despite dramatic changes in activity of MPF and MAPK, the levels of Cdc2 and Erk2 proteins were unchanged (P > 0.05) during the first 7 hr of activation. These observations suggest that inactivation of MPF and MAPK are prerequisite for the release from metaphase arrest and formation of pronuclei in bovine oocytes. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据