4.8 Article

Helicobacter pylori infection potentiates aspirin induced gastric mucosal injury in Mongolian gerbils

期刊

GUT
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 594-598

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gut.50.5.594

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are two major causes of gastric ulceration but interactions between H pylori and these drugs in gastric mucosal injury are unclear. Aims: We studied the influence of experimental H pylori infection on gastric mucosal injury induced by aspirin. Subjects: Male Mongolian gerbils free of specific pathogens were used. Methods: H pylori ATCC43504 culture broth was administered by oral gavage at seven weeks of age. After three weeks, acidified aspirin (400 mg/kg) was administered orally, and three hours later the total area of gastric erosions, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity (an index of neutrophil accumulation), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS, an index of lipid peroxidation), and KC/GRO (a chemoattractive cytokine in rodents) were measured in gastric mucosa. To determine the role of neutrophils in these circumstances, antigerbil neutrophil rabbit serum (ANS) was administered to some animals 18 hours before aspirin. Results: Aspirin caused more extensive haemorrhagic erosions (33.1 (12.3) mm(2)) associated with greater MPO activity (1887.7 (598.5) muU/mg protein) and TBARS (0.33 (0.14) nmol/mg protein) and KC/GRO concentrations (28.3 (9.5) pg/mg protein) in infected than in uninfected gerbils (13.7 (2.3); 204.0 (68.9); 0.12 (0.06); 3.1 (0.8), respectively) Pretreatment with ANS inhibited the increases in gastric erosions, MPO activity, and TBARS but not KC/GRO concentration. The reduction in aspirin induced mucosal injury by administration of ANS was much greater in H pylori infected animals (65%) than in uninfected animals (31%). Conclusions: H pylori infection potentiates aspirin induced gastric mucosal injury by mechanisms that include accumulation of activated neutrophils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据