4.7 Article

A study of the phylogeny of Brassica rapa, B-nigra, Raphanus sativus, and their related genera using noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 268-275

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00026-X

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM30998] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are two evolutionary lineages in the genus Brassica: the rapaloleracea lineage and the nigra lineage. Using nuclear DNA sequences such as the intergenic spacer between 5S rRNA genes and the internal transcribed spacer between 18S and 25S rRNA genes, we and others had previously demonstrated that Raphanus sativus is closely related to the nigra lineage. In the present Study, we sequenced the chloroplast noncoding region between trnT and trnF and that between trnD and trnT in seven species and showed that R. sativus is more closely related to the rapaloleracca lineage than to the nigra lineage. The conflicting results from nuclear DNA and chloroplast DNA support the hypothesis that Raphanus was derived from a hybridization between the rapaloleracea and the nigra lineages. We estimated the date of this hybridization event to be 60% of the divergence time between the two Brassica lineages. In addition, the pattern and rate of nucleotide substitution were studied. There were more transversions than transitions in these noncoding regions, which have a high AT content. Furthermore, the proportion of transversions among the Substitutions at a site increases with increasing A+T content of its two adjacent nucleotides. An influence of immediate 5' pyrimidine on substitution pattern is also observed when both adjacent bases in the two DNA strands are A or T. The rate of nucleotide substitution in the trnL-group I intron is only about one third of the rate in the nearby intergenic spacers in the trnT-trnF fragment. The rate of nucleotide substitution in the rapaloleracea lineage is at least 1.5 times that in the nigra lineage. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据