4.2 Review

Inhibition of graft arteriosclerosis development in rat aortas following heme oxygenase-1 gene transfer

期刊

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 2-4, 页码 235-238

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0966-3274(02)00037-0

关键词

recombinant adenovirus; graft arterioscleriosis; heme oxygenase-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heme oxygenase I (HO-1) is an enzyme which degrades heme into three end products: biliverdin, free iron and carbon monoxide. Thin enzyme has recently been shown to have anti-inflammatory and tissue protective effects. HO-I expression is involved in organ protection in pathological situations, and immunosuppressive treatments resulting in indefinite graft survival without chronic rejection have been associated with HO-1 expression by cells of the vessel wall. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of specific HO-1 overexpression. We used a recombinant adenovirus coding for human HO-1 cDNA in a rat aorta chronic rejection model, 30 days after transplantation. Control groups included rats non treated or treated with a non-coding adenovirus Addl324. We first demonstrated that AdHO-1 was efficiently expressed in endothelial cells in vitro, and in rat aortas ex vivo after adenovirus gene transfer. We found that intimal thickening in AdHO-1 treated aortas (10.8 +/- 3.8%, n = 5) was significantly decreased compared to untreated (21.2 +/- 5.6%, n = 5) or Addl324-treated (21.1 +/- 1.2%, n = 4) aortas. Immunohistology showed that treatment with AdHO-1 resulted in a significant reduction in leukocyte infiltration and a decreasing number of VSMC in the intima, compared to Addl324-treated aortas. However, this effect of HO-I on chronic rejection did not imply modifications on numbers of apoptotic cells in the graft or of alloantibody levels. We have demonstrated, for the first time, that specific HO-1 overexpression following gene transfer of HO-1 inhibited chronic rejection by reducing leukocyte and VSMC infiltration of the aorta intima. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据