4.7 Article

Seasonal variations and chemical compositions of PM2.5 aerosol in the urban area of Fuzhou, China

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 264-272

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.10.017

关键词

PM2.5; Seasonal variations; Elements; Water-soluble ions; Carbonaceous species; Fuzhou city

资金

  1. Environment Protection Department of China [201009004]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-453, KZCX2-YW-JS404, and KZCX2-EW-408]
  3. Bureau of Science and Technology, Haicang District, Xiamen, China [350205Z20095001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mass concentrations and chemical compositions (elements, water-soluble ions and carbonaceous species) of PM2.5 aerosol were detected in the urban area of Fuzhou city across four seasons from April 2007 to January 2008. The mass concentrations of PM2.5 ranged from 18.45 to 78.89 mu g/m(3), with the average value of 44.33 +/- 16.30 mu g/m(3). The elemental compositions were dominated by Si, Ca, Fe, K, and Al. SO42-, NO3-, and NH4+ were the major ions, contributing 24.3%, 9.9%, and 8.8% to the total PM2.5 mass. The concentrations of above ions showed distinct seasonality of 2.2, 8.0, and 5.9 times higher in winter than those in summer, respectively. (NH4)(2)SO4 and NH4NO3 were the main forms in summer and winter and NH4NO3 mainly existed in autumn, while (NH4)(2)SO4. NH4HSO4 and NH4NO3 existed in spring. The high NO3-/SO42- ratio suggested that vehicular exhaust made an important contribution to atmospheric pollution. TC occupied 24.1% of PM2.5 mass, with a distribution of 19.2% OC and 4.9% EC. OC and EC had the common dominant sources in spring due to their strong correlation. The OC/EC ratio showed obviously seasonal distribution of 5.0 in spring, 2.7 in summer, 3.6 in autumn, and 42 in winter. The material balance analysis indicated that the fractions of major chemical species in PM2.5 were in the following order: OM>sulfate>soil dust>nitrate>ammonium>EC>chloride. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据