4.7 Article

Histone acetylation and recruitment of serum responsive factor and CREB-binding protein onto SM22 promoter during SM22 gene expression

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 90, 期 8, 页码 858-865

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000016504.08608.B9

关键词

SM22; serum response factor; CBP/p300; histone acetylation; chromatin immunoprecipitation

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-58916-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromatin acetylation and deacetylation catalyzed by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) are closely related to eukaryotic gene transcription, Although the binding of serum response factor (SRF) to the CArG boxes in the promoter region is necessary for SM22 expression, it has never been examined whether the local chromatin modification is involved in SM22 gene regulation. In this study, we used the SM22 gene as a model to address whether transcriptional activation of the gene can be manipulated through adjusting histone acetylation of the chromatin template and whether SRF- and HAT-containing coactivators can be recruited onto the SM22 promoter region during gene activation. Here, we showed that the stimulation of the SM22 promoter by the coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP) was dependent on HAT activity. Overexpression of HDACs decreased SM22 promoter activity, whereas trichostatin A, an HDAC inhibitor, stimulated SM22 promoter activity in a CArG box-dependent manner and induced endogenous SM22 gene expression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that trichostatin A treatment in 10T1/2 cells induces chromatin hyperacetylation in the SM22 gene. Although historic hyperacetylation of the SM22 gene occurred during SM22 gene expression and SRF and CBP immunocomplexes possess HAT activities in smooth muscle cells, both SRF and CBP were recruited to the CArG box-containing region of the promoter. This study provides evidence that chromatin acetylation is involved in smooth muscle cell-specific gene regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据