4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The kinetic energy of rain measured with an optical disdrometer: An application to splash erosion

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH
卷 96, 期 2-3, 页码 225-240

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.07.013

关键词

Raindrop size distribution; Disdrometer; Rainfall kinetic energy; Weather types; Splash erosion

资金

  1. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BDE/142840/2018, PTDC/AGR-CFL/70968/2006] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present paper describes the procedures used to measure and compute the kinetic energy and various other rainfall characteristics as well as the concurrent splash erosion rates in a recently terraced forest plantation in Soutelo, north-central Portugal, from May to September 2007. This involved the use of an optical disdrometer, a standard automated rain gauge and two types of splash erosion measurement devices (i.e. 10 cups and 10 funnels). In the computation of the kinetic energy, the raindrops exceeding a specific threshold size were considered to not have a spherical shape. Without this correction for the shape of the bigger raindrops, the kinetic energy can be overestimated by 50% of its real value. A meteorological analysis indicated that four weather types with a western component produced more precipitation and kinetic energy, and, thus, a higher erosive power. The relationship between splash erosion and various rainfall characteristics set was analyzed in an exploratory manner, since the splash data only concern nine sampling periods. It showed well-defined relationships of increasing splash erosion with, amongst others, increasing total rainfall as well as total kinetic energy but these relationships require further analysis using additional data. The splash erosion figures obtained with the two types of devices showed a strong agreement but appeared to corroborate that the funnels are a more effective design than the cups. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据