4.7 Article

Ixolaris, a novel recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) from the salivary gland of the tick, Ixodes scapularis:: Identification of factor X and factor Xa as scaffolds for the inhibition of factor VIIa/tissue factor complex

期刊

BLOOD
卷 99, 期 10, 页码 3602-3612

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0237

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Saliva of the hard tick and Lyme disease vector, Ixodes scapularis, has a repertoire of compounds that counteract host defenses. Following sequencing of an I scapularis salivary gland complementary DNA (cDNA) library, a clone with sequence homology to tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) was identified. This cDNA codes for a mature protein, herein called Ixolarls, with 140 amino acids containing 10 cysteines and 2 Kunitz-like domains. Recombinant Ixolarls was expressed in insect cells and shown to inhibit factor VIIa (FVIIa)/ tissue factor (TF)-induced factor X (FX) activation with an inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50) in the picomolar range. In nondenaturing gel, Ixolaris Interacted stoichiometrically with FX and FXa but not FVIIa. Ixolaris behaves as a fast-and tight ligand of the exosites of FXa and T-carboxyglutamic acid domainless FXa (des-Gla-FXa), increasing its amidolytic activity. At high concentration, Ixolaris attenuates the amiclolytic activity of FVIIa/TF; however, in the presence of DEGR-FX or DEGR-FXa (but not des-Gla-DEGR-FXa), Ixolaris becomes a tight inhibitor of FVIIa/TF as assessed by recombinant factor IX (BeneFIX) activation assays. This indicates that FX and FXa are scaffolds for Ixolaris in the Inhibition of FVIIa/TF and Implies that the Gila domain Is necessary for FVIIa/TF/Ixolaris/ FX(a) complex formation. Additionally, we show that Ixolaris blocks FXa generation by endothelial cells expressing TF. Ixolaris may be a useful tool to study the structural features of FVIIa, FX, and FXa, and an alternative anticoagulant In cardiovascular diseases. (C) 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据