4.7 Article

A white blood cell index as the main prognostic factor in t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML):: a survey of 161 cases from the French AML Intergroup

期刊

BLOOD
卷 99, 期 10, 页码 3517-3523

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.V99.10.3517

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While the t(8;21) translocation is one of the most recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in acute myelold leukemia, prognostic studies have been hampered by the relatively few number of patients reported. We thus performed a large retrospective study In 161 adults and children with t(8;21) acute myelold leukemia, all prospectively enrolled in 6 different trials conducted In France between 1987 and 1998 (median follow-up 4.9 years). Prognostic studies were performed in the 154 patients who achieved a complete remission. Individual data were registered, including sex, age, blood and marrow counts, extramedullary disease, and cytogenetics. The value of allogeneic stem cell transplantation versus chemotherapy as postremission therapy was evaluated according to the intent-to-treat principle. Estimated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were 52% and 59%, respectively. Outcome was not significantly better in patients from the stem cell transplantation group (estimated 5-year DFS and survival, 56% vs 52% and 67% vs 57%; P =.55 and.64, respectively). White blood cell count (WBC) was the only identified prognostic factor. To further take into account the spontaneous differentiation potential of the leukemic clone, a WBC index was derived as the product of WBC by the ratio of marrow blast. This WBC index was a more powerful factor than the original WBC, allowing us to distinguish 3 subgroups of patients with different outcomes (low index, < 2.5; intermediate index, 2.5-20; high index, 20 or more). In multivariate analysis, the WBC index was the only prognostic factor for DFS (P=.003), complete remission duration (P=.002), and overall survival (P =.04). (C) 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据