4.6 Article

Automated in vitro screening of teratogens

期刊

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
卷 181, 期 1, 页码 1-15

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/taap.2002.9393

关键词

cell morphology; developmental toxicity; high-throughput screening; image analysis; teratogenicity; AM580; EM12; phytanic acid; retinoic acid; thalidomide; valproic acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a new in vitro assay for screening of potential teratogens, based on staining of cultured mouse fibroblastoid L929 cells for the determination of number of live and dead cells and of cell morphology, employing automatic video recording, followed by detection of the stained specimen and calculation of endpoint values by the use of a computerized microscope workstation. Ten different parameters were combined empirically into a single index describing general alterations in cell morphology, and, subsequently, measurements of alterations in morphology and proliferation were combined to produce a single empirical index aimed at predicting teratogenic potency. The assay was employed in two different laboratories on 10 coded compounds; 7 compounds that have demonstrated in vivo teratogenic potentials: valproic acid (VPA), pentyl-4-yn-VPA, retinoic acid (RA), 13-cis-RA, AM580, thalidomide, and alpha-EM12 and 3 compounds for which no teratogenic potential has been demonstrated: isobutyl-4-yn-VPA, phytanic acid, and beta-EM12. Within each of the three groups of compounds the nonteratogens generally caused smaller alterations in cell morphology than the teratogens, although the effects of thalidomide and related compounds generally were minor or insignificant. The data support the hypothesis that cell morphology and proliferation in combination with other endpoints may be employed for in vitro screenings of potential teratogens, although studies of additional compounds are needed in order to establish the general validity of the procedure. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据