4.4 Article

Folding and conformational consequences of glycine to alanine replacements at different positions in a collagen model peptide

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 41, 期 20, 页码 6539-6547

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi020070d

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM60048, GM45302] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The collagen model peptide T1-892 includes a C-terminal nucleation domain, (Gly-Pro-Hyp)(4), and an N-terminal (GIY-X-Y)(6) sequence taken from type I collagen. In osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and other collagen diseases, single base mutations often convert one Gly to a larger residue, and T1-892 homologues modeling such mutations were synthesized with Gly to Ala substitutions in either the (Gly-Pro-Hyp)(4) domain, Gly25Ala, or the (Gly-X-Y)6 domain, Gly10Ala. CD and NMR studies show the Gly10Ala peptide forms a normal triple-helix at the C-terminal end and propagates from the C- to the N-terminus until the Gly --> Ala substitution is encountered. At this point, triple-helix folding is terminated and cannot be reinitiated, leaving a nonhelical N-terminus. A decreased thermal stability is observed as a result of the shorter length of the triple-helix. In contrast, introduction of the Gly to Ala replacement at position 25, in the nucleation domain, shifts the monomer/trimer equilibrium toward the monomer form. The increased monomer and lower trimer populations are reflected in the dramatic decrease in triple-helix content and stability. Unlike the Ala replacement at position 10, the Ala substitution in the (Gly-Pro-Hyp)(4) region can still be incorporated into a triple-helix, but at a greatly decreased rate of folding, since the original efficient nucleation site is no longer operative. The specific consequences of Gly to Ala replacements in two distinctive sequences in this triple-helical peptide may help clarify the variability in 01 clinical severity resulting from mutations at different sites along type I collagen chains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据