4.6 Article

Preparation and dynamic mechanical properties of poly(styrene-b-butadiene)-modified clay nanocomposites

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 84, 期 8, 页码 1499-1503

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/app.10353

关键词

SBS; clay; intercalate; nanocomposites

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polybutyl acrylate (PBA) was intercalated into clay by the method of multistep exchange reactions and diffusion polymerization. The clay interlayer surface is modified, and obtaining the modified clay. The structures of the clay-PBA, clay-GA (glutamic acid), and the clay-DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD). The new hybrid nanocomposite thermoplastic elastomers were prepared by the clay-PBA with poly(styrene-b-butadiene) block copolymer (SBS) through direct melt intercalation. The dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) curves of the SBS/modified clay nanocomposites show that partial polystyrene segments of the SBS have intercalated into the modified clay interlayer and exhibited a new glass transition at about 157degreesC (T-g3). The glass transition temperature of polybutadiene segments (T-g1) and polystyrene segments out of the modified clay interlayer (T-g2) are about -76 and 94degreesC, respectively, comparied with about -79 and 100degreesC of the neat SBS, and they are basically unchanged. The T-g2 intensity of the SBS-modified clay decreases with increasing the amounts of the modified clay, and the T-g3 intensity of the SBS-modified clay decreases with increasing the amounts of the modified clay up to about 8.0 wt %. When the contents of the modified clay are less than about 8.0 wt %, the SBS-modified clay nanocomposites are homogeneous and transparent. The T-gb and T-gs of the SBS-clay (mass ratio = 98.0/2.0) are -78.39 and 98.29degreesC, respectively. This result shows that the unmodified clay does not essentially affect the T-gb and Tgs of the SBS, and no interactions occur between the SBS and the unmodified clay. (C) 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据