4.5 Article

Ground states of quantum antiferromagnets in two dimensions

期刊

ANNALS OF PHYSICS
卷 298, 期 1, 页码 58-122

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/aphy.2002.6232

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explore the ground states and quantum phase transitions of two-dimensional. spin S = 1/2, antiferromagnets by generalizing lattice models and duality transforms introduced by Sachdev and Jalabert (1990, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 4, 1043). The minimal model for square lattice antiferromagnets is a lattice discretization of the quantum nonlinear sigma model. along with Berry phases which impose quantization of spin. With full SU(2) spin rotation invariance. A e find a magnetically ordered ground state with Neel order at weak coupling and a confining paramagnetic ground state with bond charge (e.g., spin Peierls) order at strong coupling. We study the mechanisms by which these two states are connected in intermediate Coupling. We extend the minimal model to Study different routes to fractionalization and deconfinement in the ground state. and also generalize it to cases with a uniaxial anisotropy (the spin symmetry groups is then U( 1)). For the latter systems. fractionalization can appear by the pairing of vortices in the staggered spin order in the easy-plane however, we argue that this route does not survive the restoration of SU(2) spin symmetry. For SU(2) invariant systems we study a separate route to fractionalization associated with the Higgs phase of a complex boson measuring noncollinear, spiral spin correlations: we present phase diagrams displaying competition between magnetic order, bond charge order. and fractionalization. and discuss the nature of the quantum transitions between the various states. A strong check on our methods is provided by their application to S = 1/2 frustrated antiferromagnets in one dimension: here. our results are in complete accord with those obtained by bosonization and by the solution of integrable models. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据