Bypass in the absence of ipsilateral greater saphenous vein: Safety and superiority of the contralateral greater saphenous vein

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the long-term results of different autogenous conduits used for infrainguinal bypass when ipsilateral greater saphenous vein (IGSV) is absent or inadequate and to determine the impact on the contralateral lower extremity. Methods: The study was performed as a retrospective evaluation of a prospective vascular registry together with review of patient records and telephone follow-up. Results: From January 1990 to June 2000, 226 autogenous infrainguinal reconstructions were performed in 203 patients without adequate IGSV. The patients consisted of 128 men and 98 women, with a mean age of 69 years. Prevalent risk factors included diabetes (51%) and prior coronary bypass (46%). Limb salvage was the predominant indication (93%), and 59% of the procedures were secondary reconstructions. All bypasses were completed with autogenous vein, which included contralateral greater saphenous vein (CGSV; 31%), single-segment lesser saphenous vein (5%), single-segment arm vein (19%), and autogenous composite vein (45%). Bypasses were performed to the tibial and pedal arteries in 84% of the cases. The 30-day mortality and graft occlusion rates were 1% and 9%, respectively. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 24%, with a 7% rate of major complications. Follow-up was complete in 95% of patients over a mean period of 24 months (range, 0.1 to 106 months). The 5-year primary patency rates were significantly better for CGSV compared with autogenous composite vein grafts (61% +/- 7% versus 39% +/- 6%; P < .009). The 5-year secondary patency (60% to 73%) and limb salvage (78% to 81%) rates did not differ significantly between the three groups. Follow-up of the contralateral lower limb revealed that nine of 226 limbs (4%) were amputated at a mean of 36 months after the ipsilateral bypass. The overall 5-year contralateral limb preservation rate was 90% +/- 3%. Contralateral vein harvest and the presence of diabetes did not affect the need for bypass or amputation of the contralateral limb. Conclusion: For most patients with inadequate IGSV, the CGSV is the alternative conduit of choice because of its length, superior performance, ease of harvest, and minimal risk to the donor limb.