4.8 Article

Design and characterization of decoy oligonucleotides containing locked nucleic acids

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 2435-2443

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/30.11.2435

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transfection of cis-element double-stranded oligonucleotides, referred to as decoy ODNs, has been reported to be a powerful tool that provides a new class of antigene strategies for gene therapy. However, one of the major limitations of the decoy approach is the rapid degradation of phosphodiester oligonucleotides by intracellular nucleases. To date, several DNA analogs have been employed to overcome this issue, but insufficient efficacy and/or specificity have limited their in vivo usefulness. In this paper we have investigated the use of conformationally restricted nucleotides in the design of decoy molecules for nuclear transcription factor kappaB (NF-kappaB). Starting from a synthetic double-stranded oligonucleotide, containing the kappaB consensus binding sequence, we designed a panel of decoy molecules modified to various extents and at various positions with locked nucleic acids (LNAs). Our results indicate that the addition of terminal LNA bases, outside the kappaB sequence, to generate LNA-DNA-LNA co-polymers was sufficient to confer appreciable protection towards nuclease digestion, without interfering with transcription factor binding. Conversely, insertion of LNA substitutions in the context of the kappaB-binding site resulted in further increased stability, but caused a loss of affinity of NF-kappaB for the target sequence. However, our results also indicate that this latter effect was apparently dependent not only on the extent but also on strand positioning of the internal LNA substitutions. This observation is of great importance since it provides evidence for the possibility of tuning DNA-LNA duplexes with internal LNAs into decoy agents with improved features in terms of biological stability and inhibitory effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据