4.6 Article

Carbonized electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofibers as highly sensitive sensors in structural health monitoring of composite structures

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 133, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/APP.43235

关键词

composites; conducting polymers; electrospinning; fibers; mechanical properties

资金

  1. Kansas NSF EPSCoR [R51243/700333]
  2. Wichita State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibers were stabilized at 280 degrees C for 1 h in an ambient condition, and then carbonized at 850 degrees C in inert argon gas for additional 1 h in order to fabricate highly pure carbonous nanofibers for the development of highly sensitive sensors in structural health monitoring (SHM) of composite aircraft and wind turbines. This study manifests the real-time strain response of the carbonized PAN nanofibers under various tensile loadings. The prepared carbon nanofibers were placed on top of the carbon fiber pre-preg composite as a single layer. Using a hand lay-up method, and then co-cured with the pre-preg composites in a vacuum oven following the curing cycle of the composite. The electric wires were connected to the top surface of the composite panels where the cohesively bonded conductive nanofibers were placed prior to the tensile and compression loadings in the grips of the tensile unit. The test results clearly showed that the carbonized electrospun PAN nanofibers on the carbon fiber composites were remarkably performed well. Even the small strain rates (e.g., 0.020% strain) on the composite panels were easily detected through voltage and resistance changes of the panels. The change in voltage can be mainly attributed to the breakage/deformation of the conductive network of the carbonized PAN nanofibers under the loadings. The primary goal of the present study is to develop a cost-effective, lightweight, and flexible strain sensor for the SHM of composite aircraft and wind turbines. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据