4.7 Article

Organoleptic and nutritional evaluation of wheat breads supplemented with soybean and barley flour

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 77, 期 4, 页码 479-488

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00387-9

关键词

bread; wheat; soybean; barley; nutritional composition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supplementations of soy (full fat and defatted) and barley flours to wheat flours at 5, 10, 15 and 20% levels were carried out to test the effects on organoleptic and nutritional evaluation of the supplemented bread. Additions of 15% barley flour, 10% soy flour (full fat and defatted), 15% barley plus full fat soy flour and 15% barley plus defatted soy flour to wheat flour produced acceptable breads. However, substitution of soy (full fat and defatted) and barley flours to wheat flour separately and in combinations at 20% levels did not produce organoleptically acceptable bread. Various nutritional parameters, such as protein, fat, total lysine, protein digestibility (in vitro), sugars, starch digestibility (in vitro), total and available minerals, antinutrients, dietary fibre and beta-glucan were determined in supplemented and control bread. Increasing the level of substitution from 5 to 10% of full fat and defatted soy flour to wheat flour significantly (P<0.05) increased protein (from 12.1 to 13.7 and 12.4 to 13.8%), lysine (from 2.74 to 3.02 and 2.76-3.05 mg/100 g protein) and total calcium (from 70.2 to 81.4 and 71.9-81.8 mg/100 g) contents. However, there was also an increase in phytic acid (238-260 and 233-253 mg/100 g), polyphenol (324-331 and 321-329 mg/100 g) and trypsin inhibitor activity (193-204 and 193-198 TIU/g). When barley flour was substituted separately, and in combinations, with full fat and defatted soy flour up to 15%, this significantly increased the contents of protein, total lysine, dietary fibre and beta-glucan. It may be concluded that breads supplemented with barley and defatted soy flour, up to a 15% level, are organoleptically and nutritionally acceptable. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据