4.7 Article

Impacts of biomass burning smoke on the distributions and concentrations of C2-C5 dicarboxylic acids and dicarboxylates in a tropical urban environment

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 211-218

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.049

关键词

PM2.5; Photooxidation; Levoglucosan; Transboundary; Southeast Asia

资金

  1. NUS Environmental Research Institute (NERI), National University of Singapore
  2. Naval Research Laboratory Base Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Daily ambient PM2.5 was collected during 8 September to 5 October (Julian Days, JDs 252-279), 2008 in Singapore to investigate impacts of transboundary biomass burning smoke on distribution among C-2-C-5 dicarboxylic acids (DCAs) and corresponding dicarboxylate salts (DCS) in the tropical urban atmosphere. Quantification of DCAs and DCS were performed using solvent and water extraction followed by chromatography analyses via GC-MS and ion chromatography. The averaged PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations from September 19-30 (JDs 263-274) were concurrently elevated by similar to 40% due to the transboundary smoke. During this same period, C-2-C-5 total dicarboxylates (TDCAS, summation of DCAs and DCS), on average, increased more than two times, with C-2-TDCAS accounted for in average 80% of the C-2-C-5 TDCAS. This demonstrates that the transboundary smoke enriched C-2-C-5 TDCAS more than PM2.5 in the urban environment. In the presence of the transboundary smoke, the averaged concentration ratios of C-2-C-5 DCS to corresponding DCA were 13.4, 2.9, 1.0, and 1.4 with oxalate salts exhibiting the highest concentration (355.0 ng m(-3)). The transboundary smoke increased malic acid concentration more than 3.5 times, which is the largest relative increase among the quantified TDCAS. Considering that malic acid is mainly generated through ambient photooxidation, such significant increase in malic acid demonstrates more prominent photooxidation incurred by the smoke. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据