4.5 Article

Persistence and reversibility of the elevation in free sphingoid bases induced by fumonisin inhibition of ceramide synthase

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 67, 期 2, 页码 173-181

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/67.2.173

关键词

fumonisin; fusarium verticillioides; sphingolipids; liver; kidney; gastrointestinal; ceramide synthase; serine palmitoyltransferase; ISP-1; LLC-PK1 cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

These studies determined (1) the time course for sphingoid base elevation in the small intestines, liver, and kidney of mice following a single 25 mg/kg body weight (bw) oral dose (high dose) of fumonisin B-1 (FB1), (2) the minimum threshold dose of FBI that would prolong the elevated sphingoid base concentration in kidney following the single high dose, and (3) the importance of the balance between the rate of sphingoid base biosynthesis and degradation in the persistence of sphingoid base accumulation. Following the high dose of FBI, there was an increase in sphinganine in intestinal cells and liver that peaked at 4 to 12 h and declined to near the control level by 48 h. In kidney, sphinganine peaked at 6-12 h but remained elevated until 72 h, approaching control levels at 96-120 h. Oral administration of 0.03 mg FB1/kg bw (low dose) for 5 days had no effect on the sphingoid bases in kidney. However, following an initial high dose, daily administration of the low dose prolonged the elevation in kidney sphinganine compared to mice receiving a single high dose. Thus, a single exposure to a high dose of FB1 followed by daily exposure at low levels will prolong the elevation of sphinganine in kidney. In cultured renal cells FB1 was rapidly eliminated, but elevated sphinganine was persistent. This persistence in renal cells was rapidly reversed in the presence of the serine palmitoyltransferase inhibitor (ISP-1), indicating that the persistence was due to differences in the rates of sphinganine biosynthesis and degradation. The in vivo persistence in kidney may be due to similar differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据