4.5 Article

Muscarinic receptors control postprandial release of glucagon-like peptide-1:: In vivo and in vitro studies in rats

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 143, 期 6, 页码 2420-2426

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.143.6.2420

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasma levels of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) rise rapidly after nutrient ingestion through an indirect mechanism triggered from the proximal intestine and involving the vagus nerve that stimulates the L cell in the distal gut. The role of muscarinic receptors in this pathway was thus investigated using the anesthetized rat and fetal rat intestinal cells (FRIC) in culture. GLP-1 secretion from the distal gut increased 5-fold after 3 ml corn oil were placed into the proximal duodenum (P < 0.001). Atropine (a nonspecific muscarinic receptor antagonist) completely inhibited fat-induced GLP-1 secretion in vivo (P < 0.01). Pirenzepine (an M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist) also inhibited fat-induced GLP-1 secretion in vivo, by 91 +/- 6% (P < 0.01). Gallamine (an M2 muscarinic receptor antagonist) and 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine (an M3 muscarinic receptor antagonist) had no effect. Incubating FRIC cultures with bethanechol (a muscarinic receptor agonist) stimulated GLP-1 secretion to 200 +/- 22% of control (P < 0.01). Pirenzepine and gallamine significantly inhibited bethanechol-stimulated GLP-1 secretion, by 96 +/- 12% and 98 +/- 8%, respectively (P < 0.01). Unexpectedly, 4-diphenylacetoxyN-methylpiperidine stimulated GLP-1 secretion by FRIC cells, to 324 +/- 52% of the control value (P < 0.01). Double immunofluorescent staining using GLP-1 and M1, M2, and M3 muscarinic receptor antibodies showed expression of the three subtypes of muscarinic receptors by the L cells in rat ileal sections and FRIC cultures. These results demonstrate the role of M1 muscarinic receptors expressed by L cells in the control of postprandial secretion of GLP-1. M2 muscarinic receptors also seem to play a role in controlling GLP-1 secretion by fetal, but not adult, L cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据