4.2 Article

Does maternal smoking have a negative physiological effect on breastfeeding? The epidemiological evidence

期刊

BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 112-123

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00152.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Women who smoke are less likely to breastfeed their children than nonsmokers. It is thought that nicotine has a negative effect on breastmilk supply by suppressing prolactin levels. The aim of this review was to assess the epidemiological evidence that maternal smoking has a negative physiologieal effect on breastfeeding. Methods: The following data sources were searched: The Cochrane Library, Medline, CINAHL, Current Contents, Psychinfo, Sociological Abstracts and the Lactation Resource Centre (Australian Breastfeeding Association) using the keywords smoking and breastfeeding or infant feeding. The Journal of Human Lactation and Birth were hand searched. Results: Women who smoke are less likely to intend to breastfeed, less likely to initiate breastfeeding, and likely to breastfeed for a shorter duration than nonsmokers. Several studies have found a dose-response relationship between the number of cigarettes smoked each day and breastfeeding intention, initiation, and duration that persists after adjusting for confounding factors. In some population groups a high proportion of smokers breastfeed successfulIy. Conclusions: The association between maternal smoking and lack of breastfeeding is consistent across different study designs in a range of countries, Given that women who smoke are less likely to intend to breastfeed, however, it cannot be assumed that the relationship between smoking and duration of breastfeeding is a physiological one. If smoking had a consistent negative physiological effect on lactation, one would not expect to see such wide variations in breastfeeding rates among women who smoke. Therefore, it is likel - v that psychosocial factors are largely responsible for the lower rates of breastfeeding found in women who smoke compared with those who do not.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据