4.7 Article

Seasonal variability in airborne bacterial communities at a high-elevation site

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 41-49

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.005

关键词

Primary biological aerosol; High altitude site; Storm Peak Laboratory; Bacteria; Community; Colorado Rocky Mountains

资金

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Steamboat and Resort Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although bacteria are ubiquitous in the near-surface atmosphere, the temporal dynamics of airborne bacterial communities have not been well-studied. We examined seasonal shifts in bacterial abundances, the relative contribution of bacteria to total aerosol loads, and bacterial community structure at a high-elevation research station in northern Colorado, USA. Aerosol samples were collected from the near-surface atmosphere over 5-10 days during each of the four calendar seasons. Bacterial abundances varied by season with the highest concentrations observed during the fall and spring seasons, consistent with the changes in total particle concentrations, with bacterial cells often representing a large fraction (22% on average) of the total near-surface aerosol particles >0.5 mu m. Bacterial community composition, determined via barcoded pyrosequencing, also varied significantly by season. The dominant taxa in the spring, winter, and second half of the fall sampling periods (when the ground was snow covered) were bacterial taxa commonly found in other cold environments while the summer and first half of the fall samples contained taxa that were likely derived from soil and leaf-surface environments. Bacteria are clearly an important component of atmospheric aerosols with the abundance and composition of these airborne bacterial communities shaped by seasonal shifts in atmospheric conditions and the conditions of the local terrestrial environment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据