4.7 Article

Variations of surface ozone concentration across the Klang Valley, Malaysia

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 434-445

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.062

关键词

Ozone temporal variation; Spatial variation; Precursors; HYSPLIT trajectory analysis

资金

  1. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia [UKM-GUP-ASPL-07-05-138, UKM-GUP-2011-179]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hourly air quality data covering the period 2004-2008 was obtained from the Air Quality Division, the Department of Environment (DOE) through long-term monitoring by Alam Sekitar Sdn. Bhd. (ASMA) were analysed to investigate the variations of surface ozone (O-3) in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. A total of nine monitoring stations were selected for analysis in this study and the results show that there are distinct seasonal patterns in the surface O-3 across the Klang Valley. A high surface O-3 concentration is usually observed between January and April, while a low surface O-3 concentration is found between June and August. Analysis of daily variations in surface O-3 and the precursors - NO, NO2, CO, NMHC and UVb, indicate that the surface O-3 photochemistry in this study area exhibits a positive response to the intensity and wavelength in UVb while being influenced by the concentration of NO, particularly through tri-tration processes. Although results from our study suggested that NMHCs may influence the maximum O-3 concentration, further investigation is required. Wind direction during different monsoons was found to influence the concentration of O-3 around the Klang Valley. HYSPLIT back trajectories (-72 h) were used to indicate the air-mass transport patterns on days with high concentrations of surface O-3 in the study area. Results show that 47% of the high O-3 days was associated with the localized circulation. The remaining 32% and 22% were associated with mid-range and long-range transport across the South China Sea from the northeast. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据