4.8 Article

Diet and colorectal cancer: An investigation of the lectin/galactose hypothesis

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 122, 期 7, 页码 1784-1792

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.33659

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Mucosal expression of terminal unsubstituted galactose Is Increased In colon cancer and precancer and allows Interaction with mitogenic galactose-binding lectins of dietary or microbial origin. This study tests the hypothesis that galactose, which Is variably plentiful In fruit and vegetable but not cereal fibers, might prevent cancer by binding and Inhibiting such lectins. Methods: Colorectal cancer cases (512) and controls (512) were matched for age, sex, primary care practitioner, and postal code. A 1604-item food-frequency questionnaire was used to estimate their usual pre-illness (6 months previous) diet, aspirin Intake, and exercise. Results: Neither cereal fiber nor fruit and vegetable fiber were protective when assessed by univariate analysis, whereas dietary fiber galactose content showed a dose-related protective effect (odds ratio [OR] highest quartile/lowest quartile, 0.67; confidence Interval [CI], 0.47-0.95) that remained protective when adjusted for energy, red meat, alcohol, calcium, protein and fat Intake, regular aspirin usage, and exercise. Intake of nonlegume green vegetables, assessed because of the high lectin content of legumes, was also protective (OR, 0.54; Cl, 0.35-0.81), but this was not Independent of galactose. Protective effects of exercise and regular daily aspirin consumption and harmful effects of high energy consumption and high red meat Intake were confirmed. Conclusions: The protective effect of fruit and vegetable fibers may be related to their galactose content. This provides further evidence that the association between diet and colon cancer Is mediated via specific food components and may explain the discrepant results of studies addressing the protective effects of fiber.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据